Question map
With reference to Home Guards, consider the following statements : 1. Home Guards are raised under the Home Guards Act and Rules of the Central Government. 2. The role of the Home Guards is to serve as an auxiliary force to the police in maintenance of internal security. 3. To prevent infiltration on the international border/coastal areas, the Border Wing Home Guards Battalions have been raised in some States. How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (Only two) because statements 2 and 3 are correct, while statement 1 is incorrect.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: Home Guards are a voluntary force raised under the specific Home Guards Acts and Rules of the respective States/Union Territories, not the Central Government. Although the Ministry of Home Affairs provides guidelines and funding, the statutory powers lie with the States.
- Statement 2 is correct: The primary role of Home Guards is to serve as an auxiliary force to the police. They assist in maintaining internal security, communal harmony, and public order, as well as providing help during natural calamities.
- Statement 3 is correct: Specific Border Wing Home Guards (BWHG) battalions have been raised in border states (like Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Punjab) to assist the Border Security Force in preventing infiltration and protecting the international border and coastal areas.
Since only statements 2 and 3 are factually accurate, the correct choice is Only two.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Administrative Minutiae' bouncer. It bypasses standard Polity books (Laxmikanth) and dives into the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Annual Report. The core trap is Federalism: confusing a State-level auxiliary force with Central rules. Strategy: For security bodies, always map the 'Parent Ministry' and 'Legal Basis' (State vs Centre).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are Home Guards in India raised under a Home Guards Act and under rules made by the Central Government?
- Statement 2: Do Home Guards in India serve as an auxiliary force to the police for the maintenance of internal security?
- Statement 3: Have Border Wing Home Guards battalions been raised in some Indian states?
- Statement 4: Are Border Wing Home Guards battalions in India specifically raised to prevent infiltration on international borders and coastal areas?
- Directly states how Home Guards are legally raised.
- Specifies that the Rules are those of the States/UTs (not rules made by the Central Government).
- Shows a State (Meghalaya) adopting a specific Home Guards Act and Rules (Assam Home Guards Acts and Rules, 1947).
- Supports that Home Guards arrangements are implemented at the State/UT level via adaptation of Acts/rules.
- Shows the central government (Ministry of Home Affairs) issues guidance (Compendium of Instruction, 2007).
- Indicates central guidance exists but does not state that rules are made by the Central Government.
Snippet explicitly records the exact claim as a formal statement to be considered about Home Guards, indicating this is a recognized legal-technical proposition.
A student could take this wording and look up the Home Guards Act or exam answer keys to verify whether the claim is affirmed or negated.
Explains that the Ministry of Home Affairs is the nodal central ministry for many matters relating to Union Territories and administration.
A student might infer that if Home Guards fall under internal security/administration, MHA could frame rules—so they would check MHA notifications or rules for Home Guards.
Describes a general pattern where the Central Government makes rules for All-India Services (e.g., recruitment/service conditions) showing central rule-making over certain personnel matters.
By analogy, a student could ask whether Home Guards are treated as a centrally-ruled force and search for an Act/rules specifying central rule-making.
Shows the All-India Services Act authorised the Central Government to make rules in consultation with states—an example of central rule-making under a statute for forces/services.
A student could use this pattern to look for a statutory provision (a 'Home Guards Act') that delegates rule-making to the Central Government.
Illustrates the distinction and division of roles between central investigative agencies and state police, highlighting that some forces/functions are centrally regulated while others are state subjects.
A student could use this central-vs-state division as a heuristic to determine whether Home Guards are likely under state legislation or central rules, then check the relevant jurisdictions' statutes.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.