Question map
Consider the following : 1. Butterflies 2. Fish 3. Frogs How many of the above have poisonous species among them ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because all three groups—butterflies, fish, and frogs—contain poisonous species.
**Butterflies**: Several butterfly species, particularly monarchs, are poisonous due to toxins they accumulate from their larval host plants (like milkweed), which makes them toxic to predators.
**Fish**: High levels of mercury in fish stocks have been found mainly in coastal areas.[1] Additionally, many fish species like pufferfish contain natural toxins (tetrodotoxin) that can be harmful or fatal to humans.
**Frogs**: Poison Dart Frogs got their name because hounds would tip their arrows in the frog's poisons.[2] These frogs secrete potent toxins through their skin as a defense mechanism against predators.
Since all three groups have documented poisonous species, the answer is "All three," making option C correct.
Sources- [1] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > 29.r.4. Mercury > p. 413
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 12: Animal Diversity of India > Do you know? > p. 187
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Existence Heuristic' question. It doesn't require memorizing a list of every toxic animal; it tests the biological principle that in massive taxonomic groups (thousands of species of fish/insects), chemical defense is a common evolutionary adaptation. If you know one famous example (e.g., Monarch Butterfly or Pufferfish), the logic holds.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are there butterfly species that are poisonous (have toxic chemical defenses)?
- Statement 2: Are there fish species that are poisonous (contain toxins harmful to predators or humans)?
- Statement 3: Are there frog species that are poisonous (have toxic skin secretions harmful to predators or humans)?
This snippet explicitly lists 'butterfly' as an insect, establishing that butterflies belong to the biological group (insects) commonly discussed in toxicology and ecology contexts.
A student can use the fact that butterflies are insects to ask whether known insect defensive strategies (e.g., chemical defenses) also occur in butterflies and then check entomological sources.
Explains that certain chemicals (neonicotinoids) act on insect nervous systems and that insects can be differentially affected by chemicals, showing insects as a class interact biologically with toxic compounds.
A student could extend this by noting that if insects respond to and accumulate chemicals, some insect species (potentially including butterflies) might carry or sequester toxins as defenses; this suggests searching for examples of chemically defended insects.
Gives an example (poison dart frogs) of animals that are poisonous because of skin/ingested toxins, demonstrating the ecological pattern that some small animals use chemical defenses.
A student can generalize that chemical defence is a known ecological strategy and therefore plausibly look for analogous strategies in other small animals, including insects like butterflies.
Describes bioassays using insects to determine lethal or effective concentrations of chemicals, implying insects are subjects of toxicological study and can be sensitive to or involved in accumulation of toxins.
A student might infer that because insects are studied for toxicity and chemical interactions, some insect species may possess or accumulate toxins, motivating targeted literature checks for butterflies with chemical defenses.
Shows that environmental materials (plastics) can concentrate toxic organic compounds which affect animals, illustrating the broader point that organisms can accumulate toxins from their diet or environment.
A student could extend this general accumulation pattern to consider whether herbivorous insects (like many butterfly larvae) might sequester plant-produced toxins, prompting a focused search for examples.
- Explicitly warns that consuming fish caught during algal blooms can result in illness
- Links contaminated seafood consumption to human health risk
- Identifies monomethyl mercury as highly toxic and notes its accumulation in edible fish tissue
- Specifies severe human health impacts from methylmercury in fish stocks
- Explains biomagnification of persistent pesticides (DDT) from water to fish-eating organisms and humans
- Shows that long-lasting pollutants can concentrate in fish and pose risks up the food chain
- Explicitly refers to frogs' poisons and the use of frog toxins on arrows, demonstrating poisonous skin secretions.
- Names poison dart frogs (e.g., Blue Poison Dart Frog) as examples, linking a taxon to toxic defenses.
- [THE VERDICT]: Logical Sitter. While Shankar IAS explicitly covers Frogs (Poison Dart) and implies Fish (toxicity/algal blooms), the Butterfly link is basic NCERT Biology (Monarch Butterfly warning coloration).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Evolutionary Adaptations & Defense Mechanisms (Mimicry, Camouflage, Chemical Defense).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Weird' Toxic/Venomous classes: 1. Birds (Hooded Pitohui), 2. Mammals (Slow Loris, Platypus, Solenodon), 3. Fish (Pufferfish/Tetrodotoxin, Stonefish), 4. Butterflies (Monarch - eats milkweed), 5. Cephalopods (Blue-ringed Octopus).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Stop looking for a single page that lists 'All Poisonous Animals'. Instead, apply the 'Law of Large Numbers' in Biology: If a group (like Fish or Butterflies) has 20,000+ species, the probability of *none* of them being poisonous is statistically zero. Assume 'Yes' for broad biological possibilities.
Some animals produce or sequester toxic chemicals as a defensive trait, so the existence of poisonous species is a biological adaptation to consider.
High-yield: links ecology, species interactions and conservation; helps distinguish naturally toxic organisms from those harmed by pollutants and frames questions about adaptive significance and protection measures.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 12: Animal Diversity of India > Do you know? > p. 187
Human-made chemicals such as PCBs, DDT and mercury can concentrate in ecosystems and cause toxicity across trophic levels, affecting wildlife health and conservation.
High-yield: central to environment and ecology topics; connects pollution sources, biomagnification, and impacts on species (including insects), and is commonly tested in questions on environmental hazards and policy.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > Impact of Microparticles > p. 97
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > 29.r.4. Mercury > p. 413
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: Geographical Perspective on Selected Issues and Problems > Water Pollution > p. 96
Neonicotinoids are nicotine-like chemicals that act on insect nervous systems and are especially toxic to insects, affecting insect populations and pollinators.
High-yield: ties agriculture, pest management and pollinator conservation; useful for evaluating policy debates on pesticide regulation and ecological consequences for insects such as butterflies.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 6: Environmental Issues > Neonicotinoids > p. 120
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 9: Indian Biodiversity Diverse Landscape > ENVIRONMENT > p. 156
Explains how lipophilic and persistent pollutants concentrate in fish tissues and magnify up trophic levels, making fish toxic to predators and humans.
High-yield for environment and health topics: explains why pollutants like DDT and PCBs pose long-term risks through seafood consumption, links to pollution control and food safety policy, and enables answers on ecosystem and human-health impacts.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 2: Functions of an Ecosystem > 2.5.2. Biomagnification > p. 16
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > 29.1.6. DDT > p. 414
Describes algal-produced neurotoxins and hepatotoxins that contaminate shellfish and fish and cause poisonings in humans and marine life.
Important for questions on coastal pollution, fisheries management and public health: connects causes (eutrophication), impacts (shellfish/fish poisoning, fish kills) and mitigation (monitoring, closures), and supports case-based policy answers.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 4: Aquatic Ecosystem > Toxicity > p. 38
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 4: Aquatic Ecosystem > 4.4.4.Is HAB's an environmental hazard? > p. 39
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 4: Aquatic Ecosystem > 4.4.6. Is it safe to eat seafood? > p. 40
Specifies methylmercury accumulation in fish tissue and its severe toxicity to humans.
Useful for environment-health and industrial pollution questions: explains industrial sources, bioaccumulation in edible fish, public-health advisories and regulatory measures; links pollution, human health and fisheries economics.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > 29.r.4. Mercury > p. 413
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.15.6. Trigger Effect of Acid Rain on Pollutants: > p. 105
Some frog species possess toxic skin secretions used as a defence, exemplified by poison dart frogs.
High-yield for ecology and biodiversity topics: explains predator–prey interactions, adaptations, and human-wildlife risk. Connects to questions on animal defence mechanisms, toxicology, and species-specific traits commonly asked in environment and biodiversity sections.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 12: Animal Diversity of India > Do you know? > p. 187
Venomous Mammals. Since they asked about Fish, Frogs, and Butterflies, the next logical bouncer is 'Are there any poisonous/venomous birds or mammals?' Answer: Yes (Hooded Pitohui, Slow Loris, Platypus).
The 'Diversity Rule'. In a group as diverse as 'Fish' (34,000 species) or 'Butterflies' (17,500 species), it is biologically impossible for *zero* species to have evolved toxicity. If the option implies 'None', it is wrong. 'All three' is the safest bet for 'existence' questions in biodiversity.
Bioprospecting & The Nagoya Protocol (Environment/IR). Many of these natural toxins (e.g., from Cone Snails or Frogs) are used by indigenous tribes (Traditional Knowledge) and are targets for pharmaceutical research (Biopiracy). This links biodiversity to Intellectual Property Rights.