Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. It is the Governor of the State who recognizes and declares any community of that State as a Scheduled Tribe. 2. A community declared as a Scheduled Tribe in a State need not be so in another State. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (Statement 2 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The President of India has the authority to designate tribes or tribal groups, as Article 342 of the Constitution mandates the notification of the Statutory List of Scheduled[1] Tribes. The President is empowered to draw up a list in consultation with the Governor of each state, subject to revision by Parliament.[2] The Governor plays only a consultative role; the final authority rests with the President, not the Governor.
**Statement 2 is correct:** Scheduled Tribe status is state-specific in India. The President has made Orders specifying the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in India[2] in consultation with Governors of each state, meaning the lists vary by state. A community recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in one state may not have that status in another state, as the designation depends on the specific Presidential order for that particular state.
Sources- [2] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 32: MINORITIES, SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES > CHAP. 32] MINORITIES, SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES 457 > p. 457
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Authority Swap' trap (Governor vs President). The question tests fundamental constitutional provisions (Art 342) found in every standard Polity text. If you missed this, your static core is vulnerable.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Under the Constitution of India, does the Governor of a State have the authority to recognize and declare a community of that State as a Scheduled Tribe?
- Statement 2: In India, can a community be declared a Scheduled Tribe in one State but not be listed as a Scheduled Tribe in another State (i.e., are Scheduled Tribe listings state-specific)?
- Directly states which constitutional authority names Scheduled Tribes — the President under Article 342.
- Implies listing/notification of Scheduled Tribes is a Presidential function, not a State Governor's power.
- Specifies that the President (not the Governor) declares areas as Scheduled Areas, with any Governor involvement being consultative.
- Shows central (President) role in designation decisions, distinguishing it from Governor powers.
States that the President is empowered to draw up the lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 'in consultation with the Governor of each State' (Articles 341-342).
A student could infer the formal power to 'specify' lists is with the President (Centre) and test whether 'consultation' implies a merely advisory role for the Governor rather than unilateral recognition.
Explicitly notes the President has power to draw up and notify lists of Scheduled Castes and Tribes and that consultation with the Governor is required in the case of lists relating to a State.
Use this rule to distinguish central (President/Parliament) competence from State executive powers and check whether any constitutional provision gives the Governor independent listing power.
Gives criteria and administrative practice for declaring 'scheduled areas' and states the Governor has a special responsibility regarding such areas.
Differentiate 'scheduled areas' (area designation involving Governor) from 'scheduled tribes' (community designation) and investigate if Governor's 'special responsibility' over areas implies authority to list communities.
Describes state-level institutional arrangements (Tribes Advisory Council) and central powers to give directions and appoint commissions concerning scheduled tribes and areas.
A student can contrast these state advisory/administrative roles with the President's list-making function to assess whether state bodies/Governor have declaration authority.
Shows an example where the Governor can exercise certain executive discretion at the state level (excluding matters from SPSC consultation), indicating some independent state executive powers.
Combine this with the central list-making clues to examine whether any analogous constitutional clause grants the Governor unilateral power to declare communities as Scheduled Tribes.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.