Consider the following statements regarding 'Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam' : 1. Provisions will come into effect from the 18th Lok Sabha. 2. This will be in force for 15 years after becoming an Act. 3. There are provisions for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes Women within the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes. Which of the statements given above are correct ?

Gives a clear example (Official Languages provisions) where the Constitution and subsequent statute tied the continued use of English/Devanagari to a 15‑year transitional period and later parliamentary law.

A student could compare the drafting language and transitional clauses of that 15‑year example with the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam text to see whether a similar time‑limited clause appears.

Shows that other Acts sometimes include explicit temporal limits (example: provision barring contempt proceedings after expiry of one year), illustrating the practice of specifying duration/limits in statute text.

Use this as a pattern to look for any explicit 'shall remain in force for X years' or 'expires after X years' clause in the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam.

Explains a general rule that laws made under certain circumstances (e.g., during President's Rule) continue beyond the triggering condition, illustrating that statute duration can be expressly tied or not tied to external events.

Helps a student decide whether to expect express linkage of the Act's operation to an external period (like '15 years') or independent permanence when reading the Act's clauses.

Confirms the existence and subject matter of the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (Women's Reservation Act, 2023) but contains no duration — illustrating absence of direct support and the need to inspect the Act for temporal clauses.

A student can use this to justify checking the enacted text (or official gazette) for any limited‑duration clause rather than relying on secondary summaries.

States a clear rule for panchayats: one-third reservation for women applies not merely in general category but also within seats reserved for SCs, STs and OBCs.

A student could treat this as a precedentary pattern of how women-reservation laws have been applied and check whether the Nari Shakti Act uses the same drafting approach/phrasing for Lok Sabha/Assemblies.

Explains Article 243D: out of seats reserved for SCs/STs in panchayats, not less than one-third must be reserved for women of those groups.

Use this constitutional provision as an example of an explicit rule that could be analogously applied at parliamentary level if the Act or enabling provisions mirror such constitutional language.

Notes municipalities' one-third women reservation 'including the number of seats reserved for women belonging to the SCs and the STs' — the phrasing 'including' shows an explicit inclusion model.

Compare the exact wording of the Nari Shakti Act to see if it likewise uses inclusive phrasing; similar wording would support inference that SC-women get seats within SC quotas.

States that the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam grants 33% reservation for women in Lok Sabha and State Assemblies (i.e., the Act creates general women reservation at parliamentary level).

Combine this fact with the local-government pattern (snippets 1/4/6) to form a hypothesis: if the Act follows local-government drafting practice, it may preserve women-reservation inside existing SC/ST reserved seats; check the Act's scheduling/definitions.

Describes that seats are reserved for SCs/STs in Parliament and those seats are elected by all voters; shows the pre-existing mechanism for SC/ST reservation at parliamentary level.

A student can use this to reason that adding a 33% women quota for Lok Sabha requires clarification on interaction with existing SC/ST reserved seats — so inspecting whether the Act specifies internal allocation (e.g., one-third of SC-reserved seats) would resolve the question.