UPSC Mains 2021 GS4 Q9 — Case study: Infrastructure safety
An elevated corridor is being constructed to reduce traffic congestion in the capital of a particular state. You have been selected as project manager of this prestigious project on your professional competence and experience. The deadline is to complete the project in next two years by 30 June, 2021, since this project is to be inaugurated by the Chief Minister before the elections are announced in the second week of July 2021. While carrying out the surprise inspection by inspecting team, a minor crack was noticed in one of the piers of the elevated corridor possibly due to poor material used. You immediately informed the chief engineer and stopped further work. It was assessed by you that minimum three piers of the elevated corridor have to be demolished and reconstructed. But this process will delay the project minimum by four to six months. But the chief engineer overruled the observation of inspecting team on the ground that it was a minor crack which will not in any way impact the strength and durability of the bridge. He ordered you to overlook the observation of inspecting team and continue working with same speed and tempo. He informed you that the minister does not want any delay as he wants the Chief Minister to inaugurate the elevated corridor before the elections are declared. Also informed you that the contractor is far relative of the minister and he wants him to finish the project. He also gave you hint that your further promotion as additional chief engineer is under consideration with the ministry. However, you strongly felt that the minor crack in the pier of the elevated corridor will adversely affect the health and life of the bridge and therefore it will be very dangerous not to repair the elevated corridor. (a) Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a project manager? (b) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by the project manager? (c) What are the professional challenges likely to be faced by the project manager and his response to overcome such challenges? (d) What can be the consequences of overlooking the observation raised by the inspecting team? (Answer in 250 words)
Question Decoded — examiner's intent
- Directive verbs
- what are the optionsWhat are the ethical dilemmasWhat can be the consequences
- Scope keywords
- professional competence and experiencepoor material usedstrength and durabilitypromotion as additional chief engineeradversely affect the health and life of the bridgecontractor is far relative of the minister
- Implicit sub-parts
- Evaluation of each option listed: Assessing the pros and cons of compliance versus whistleblowing.
- The conflict between personal career growth (promotion) and public safety (utilitarianism).
- Strategies to gather technical evidence to counter the Chief Engineer's 'minor crack' claim objectively.
- Institutional safeguards to prevent political pressure from compromising structural engineering standards.
- Common pitfalls
- Taking a radical 'heroic' stance without first exhausting internal departmental grievance or technical review mechanisms.
- Failing to explicitly address the 'nepotism' aspect regarding the contractor's relationship with the minister.
- Ignoring the specific timeline (June 30, 2021) and failing to propose a middle path like accelerated reconstruction or partial opening.
- Focusing only on the risk of the bridge falling and ignoring the legal/criminal liability the manager faces under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
- Dimensions required
- Professional Ethics (Structural Integrity)Public Safety and Human RightsAdministrative AccountabilityLegal and Penal ConsequencesCorporate Governance (Contractor Management)
- Marks allocation hint
Allocate roughly 40 words each to parts (a) and (b) to establish the conflict. Dedicate 100 words to part (c) as it asks for both challenges and responses, which is the core of the 'action'. Reserve 70 words for part (d) to highlight the catastrophic human and systemic costs of negligence.
Unlock the full analysis for this question
You've seen the question and its examiner-intent decoding. Subscribers also get:
- 🔗 Similar Previous Year Questions — cross-year, cross-paper matches so you study the topic, not the question
- 📚 Source Map — verified citations from Laxmikanth, NCERT, PRS, Yojana, Economic Survey, Spectrum
- 🌱 How this topic is evolving — current-affairs bridge anchored to live TARS news clustering
- 🧭 Examiner's Pattern — how the topic has been framed across every year UPSC has tested it
- ✍️ Answer Skeleton — a structured outline (intro → body → conclusion) you can flesh out
- 🎯 AI evaluation — write your answer, get rubric-based scoring from gs-eval
Or browse 132+ free preview questions across all years and papers — the first 3 questions of every paper are unlocked.
Ready to practice?
Subscribers can attempt this question in 250 words and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where they stand.
Subscribe to evaluate your answer →