GS4 2021 Q11 20 marks 250 words Case study: Corporate ethics

UPSC Mains 2021 GS4 Q11 — Case study: Corporate ethics

A reputed food product company based in India developed a food product for the international market and started exporting the same after getting necessary approvals. The company announced this achievement and also indicated that soon the product will be made available for the domestic consumers with almost same quality and health benefits. Accordingly, the company got its product approved by the domestic competent authority and launched the product in Indian market. The company could increase its market share over a period of time and earned substantial profit both domestically and internationally. However, the random sample test conducted by inspecting team found the product being sold domestically in variance with the approval obtained from the competent authority. On further investigation, it was also discovered that the food company was not only selling products which were not meeting the health standard of the country but also selling the rejected export products in the domestic market. This episode adversely affected the reputation and profitability of the food company. (a) What action do you visualize should be taken by the competent authority against the food company for violating the laid down domestic food standard and selling rejected export products in domestic market? (b) What course of action is available with the food company to resolve the crisis and bring back its lost reputation? (c) Examine the ethical dilemma involved in the case. (Answer in 250 words)

Question Decoded — examiner's intent

Directive verbs
VisualizeResolveExamine
Scope keywords
violating the laid down domestic food standardselling rejected export productsresolve the crisislost reputationethical dilemma
Implicit sub-parts
  • Classification of the violations into legal, procedural, and ethical breaches.
  • Categorization of administrative actions: immediate punitive vs. long-term regulatory compliance.
  • Strategic communication and structural reforms within the company's internal quality control.
  • Tension between profit maximization and the 'Duty of Care' towards domestic consumers.
Common pitfalls
  • Focusing only on the legal punishment (fines/license) while ignoring the ethical dimension of treating domestic citizens as 'second-class' consumers compared to international ones.
  • Proposing generic PR exercises for the company instead of concrete quality-assurance overhauls.
  • Failing to distinguish between the two distinct crimes: selling sub-standard food vs. the fraudulent sale of rejected export batches.
  • Ignoring the role of whistleblowing or third-party audits in the 'course of action' for the company.
Dimensions required
Legal/Regulatory (FSSAI Act)Corporate GovernancePublic Health and SafetyBusiness Ethics (Profits vs. Principles)Consumer Rights
Marks allocation hint

Allocate roughly 70-80 words to part (a) focusing on punitive and corrective measures. Use 80-90 words for part (b) detailing a multi-pronged recovery strategy (Quality, Transparency, Accountability). Reserve 70-80 words for part (c) to discuss the ethical conflict between 'shareholder wealth' and 'stakeholder health', specifically the double standards in global vs. domestic quality.

Unlock the full analysis for this question

You've seen the question and its examiner-intent decoding. Subscribers also get:

  • 🔗 Similar Previous Year Questions — cross-year, cross-paper matches so you study the topic, not the question
  • 📚 Source Map — verified citations from Laxmikanth, NCERT, PRS, Yojana, Economic Survey, Spectrum
  • 🌱 How this topic is evolving — current-affairs bridge anchored to live TARS news clustering
  • 🧭 Examiner's Pattern — how the topic has been framed across every year UPSC has tested it
  • ✍️ Answer Skeleton — a structured outline (intro → body → conclusion) you can flesh out
  • 🎯 AI evaluation — write your answer, get rubric-based scoring from gs-eval

Or browse 132+ free preview questions across all years and papers — the first 3 questions of every paper are unlocked.

Ready to practice?

Subscribers can attempt this question in 250 words and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where they stand.

Subscribe to evaluate your answer →