Option 1: Baroda - This Princely State opted for a direct dealing with the Constituent Assembly in 1946 instead of going through the Chamber of Princes. This means that Baroda chose to directly engage with the Constituent Assembly, which was responsible for drafting the Indian Constitution, rather than communicating through the Chamber of Princes, which was an advisory body for the princely states. By directly dealing with the Constituent Assembly, Baroda expressed its interest and involvement in the process of creating the new Constitution. It demonstrated a willingness to engage in direct discussions and negotiations with the assembly rather than relying on intermediaries. This decision may have been influenced by various factors, such as the political climate at the time and the desire for direct representation in the shaping of the future of independent India.