Consider the following statements: As per the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central (Amendment) Rules, 2018 1. if rules for fixed-term employment are implemented, it becomes easier for the firms/companies to layoff workers. 2. no notice of termi

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 40 (IAS/2019)
Consider the following statements: As per the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central (Amendment) Rules, 2018
1. if rules for fixed-term employment are implemented, it becomes easier for the firms/companies to layoff workers.
2. no notice of termination of employment shall be necessary in the case of temporary workman.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct?

question_subject: 

Economics

question_exam: 

IAS

stats: 

0,82,100,37,32,82,31

keywords: 

{'termination': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'term employment': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'employment': [0, 4, 2, 24], 'temporary workman': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'industrial employment': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'amendment': [2, 1, 0, 5], 'workers': [2, 1, 6, 18], 'standing orders': [0, 0, 0, 1]}

The given question has two statements about the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central (Amendment) Rules, 2018.

Option 1 suggests that fixed-term employment rules would make it easier for firms/companies to layoff workers. This is accurate because fixed-term contracts provide flexibility for employers to hire employees for specific periods, allowing termination without repercussions at the end of the term.

Option 2 mentions there`s no requirement for notice of termination in cases of temporary workmen. This is also correct since these rules explicitly exclude the need of notice for termination in cases of temporary workmen.

As both statements are accurate, option 3 - "Both 1 and 2" - is the right answer. It means both described rules are part of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central (Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The remaining options 1, 2 and 4 are incorrect as they suggest only one or none of the statements are correct.