Which one of the following statements about the Attorney General of India is not correct ?

examrobotsa's picture
Q: 19 (NDA-II/2021)

Which one of the following statements about the Attorney General of India is not correct ?

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

NDA-II

stats: 

0,54,32,70,4,7,5

keywords: 

{'attorney general': [1, 0, 0, 1], 'supreme court': [12, 1, 4, 14], 'judge': [6, 1, 14, 17], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13], 'president': [4, 0, 2, 1], 'legal matters': [0, 0, 0, 1]}

Option 1 states that the Attorney General of India has the right of audience only in the Supreme Court of India. This means that the Attorney General can present arguments and represent the government only in the Supreme Court. This statement is incorrect because the Attorney General has the right to practice and represent the government in any court within the country, including the subordinate courts.

Option 2, on the other hand, is correct. The remuneration or salary of the Attorney General of India is determined by the President of India. The Attorney General does not have a fixed salary but is eligible for getting remuneration as determined by the President.

Option 3 is also correct. The Attorney General should be qualified to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. This means that the person should possess the qualifications and experience required to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Option 4 is also correct. The main responsibility of the Attorney General is to give advice to the Government of India on all legal matters. The Attorney General acts as the principal legal advisor to the government and provides legal opinions and guidance on various issues.

In conclusion, option 1 is incorrect because the Attorney General of India has the right to practice and represent the government in any court, not just the Supreme

Practice this on app