Option 1 states that the Parliament has the authority to establish Administrative Tribunals at both the Union (central government) and State levels. This means that these tribunals can be created to deal with administrative and service-related disputes at different levels of government.

Option 2 correctly states that Administrative Tribunals can handle disputes and complaints relating to the recruitment and conditions of service of individuals employed in public services. This includes matters such as appointments, promotions, transfers, and disciplinary actions.

Option 3 states that Tribunals established by a law of the Parliament have the ability to exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts. This means that if a case falls under the jurisdiction of a specific Administrative Tribunal, then the normal courts would not have the authority to hear and decide on that case. This provision allows for a specialized forum for resolving administrative disputes.

Option 4 states that the law establishing the Tribunals can also provide for the procedures to be followed, including the rules of evidence. This allows the Tribunals to have their own set of procedures and rules tailored to deal with administrative matters efficiently.

Therefore, option 3 is incorrect. It wrongly states that Tribunals can exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts to allow for special leave to appeal. This is not the case as the