Question map
The establishment of 'Payment Banks' is being allowed in India to promote financial inclusion. Which of the following statements is/are correct in this context? 1. Mobile telephone companies and supermarket chains that are owned and controlled, by residents are eligible to be promoters of Payment Banks. 2. Payment Banks can issue both credit cards and debit cards. 3. Payment Banks cannot undertake lending activities. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (statements 1 and 3 only).
Statement 1 is correct as mobile telephone companies and supermarket chains that are owned and controlled by residents are eligible to be promoters of Payment Banks[2].
Statement 2 is incorrect. Payment Banks cannot issue credit cards but can issue debit cards[4]. They can issue ATM/Debit Cards for payments and remittance services[1].
Statement 3 is correct. Payment Banks cannot give depositor's money as loans[4], meaning they are not allowed to lend[5]. This restriction ensures they focus on their primary objective of providing low-cost payment and remittance services to promote financial inclusion among migrant laborers, self-employed individuals, and low-income households.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option B the right answer.
Sources- [1] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
- [2] https://ijirt.org/publishedpaper/IJIRT168218_PAPER.pdf
- [3] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 191
- [4] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 191
- [5] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 21. Payment Banks: > p. 87
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question defines the 'New Banking Structure' era (2014-2016). While it was Current Affairs then, it is now core Static Economy. The key to cracking such questions is focusing on the 'Negative List'—what a new entity is explicitly FORBIDDEN from doing (e.g., lending, credit cards).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are mobile telephone companies owned and controlled by residents eligible to be promoters of Payment Banks in India under RBI guidelines?
- Statement 2: Are supermarket chains owned and controlled by residents eligible to be promoters of Payment Banks in India under RBI guidelines?
- Statement 3: Are Payment Banks in India permitted by the Reserve Bank of India to issue credit cards?
- Statement 4: Are Payment Banks in India permitted by the Reserve Bank of India to issue debit cards?
- Statement 5: Are Payment Banks in India prohibited from undertaking lending activities under Reserve Bank of India regulations?
- The Payments Bank guidelines explicitly list 'other entities like mobile telephone companies' as eligible promoters.
- The snippet names examples of Payments Banks (Airtel Payments Bank, Paytm Payments Bank), showing real-world application of mobile telecoms as promoters.
- Explicitly lists supermarket chains among entities that 'may apply to set up payments banks'.
- Directly ties supermarket chains to eligibility for payment bank promotion/application.
- RBI guidelines list 'Entities / groups in the private sector that are ‘owned and controlled by residents’' as eligible promoters.
- This wording establishes a resident ownership/control requirement for eligible private-sector promoter entities.
- Notes that supermarket chains were allowed to apply for payment bank licences.
- Supports that supermarket chains are among categories eligible under the payment bank scheme.
The MCQ statement explicitly asserts that 'Mobile telephone companies and supermarket chains that are owned and controlled by residents are eligible to be promoters of Payments Banks,' indicating this idea appears in standard study material.
A student could treat this as a claim to verify by consulting the original RBI Payments Bank promoter-eligibility list or the official guidelines to confirm whether supermarket chains are named.
RBI guidelines excerpt states eligible promoters include 'other entities like mobile telephone companies, etc.' and gives examples of payment banks (Airtel Payments Bank), showing telcos are explicitly included and 'etc.' may imply other non-bank entities.
A student could interpret 'etc.' as a category that might cover large retail chains and then check RBI's detailed promoter categories or licensing circulars to see if supermarket chains are listed.
Examples of payment banks (India Post, Airtel, Paytm) include non-bank players and a telecom firm, illustrating that non-traditional financial-sector firms have been granted payment-bank licenses.
A student could compare the business models of these approved promoters (e.g., Airtel) with supermarket chains to assess whether supermarket chains meet similar criteria (resident ownership, business scope) required by RBI.
The list of authorized retail payment operators includes 'Prepaid Instruments (AmazonPay)', showing large retail/e‑commerce players can operate payment-related services under RBI oversight.
A student could reason that if e‑commerce/retail players operate payment instruments, supermarket chains might analogously qualify as promoter-type non-bank entities, and then verify via RBI promoter eligibility text.
- Explicit statement that payment banks 'will not be allowed to lend and issue credit cards'.
- Directly links RBI licensing/permission for Payment Banks to the prohibition on issuing credit cards.
- Clearly contrasts Payment Banks with others by stating 'They also cannot issue Credit Card but can issue a Debit Card.'
- Provides an unambiguous prohibition on credit-card issuance by Payment Banks.
- Specifies permitted card instruments for Payment Banks: 'Can issue ATM/Debit Cards', implying absence of credit-card permission.
- Describes other regulatory features (deposit cap, investment rules) that frame limited scope of Payment Banks' activities.
- Explicitly states Payments Banks 'Can issue ATM/Debit Cards' in the guidelines summary.
- Snippet is a guidelines summary describing permitted services of Payments Banks (authoritative context).
- Also lists Payments Bank examples, indicating practical application of the rule.
- Clearly contrasts credit-card restriction with allowance: 'cannot issue Credit Card but can issue a Debit Card.'
- Directly affirms debit-card issuance capability for Payments Banks.
- States Payments Banks 'will not be allowed to lend and issue credit cards', which implicitly distinguishes credit-card prohibition from other card services (i.e., debit/ATM cards).
- Supports the regulatory framing of permitted vs prohibited activities for Payments Banks.
- Explicit statement that 'payment banks will not be allowed to lend and issue credit cards.'
- Context lists RBI licensing and specific restrictions (deposit cap) for Payment Banks, reinforcing regulatory limits on activities.
- Guidelines enumerate permitted functions (accept deposits up to a limit, issue ATM/debit cards, maintain CRR, invest major portion in SLR securities) without listing lending as an activity.
- Specifies structural/operational constraints (deposit limit, investment in G-Secs) that align with a non-lending model.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. In 2016, this was headline news (Nachiket Mor Committee). Standard sources (Vivek Singh/Singhania) now cover the 'No Lending/No Credit Card' rule as a basic fact.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Financial Inclusion & Banking Reforms. Specifically, the 'Differentiated Banking' license framework introduced by RBI.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Compare Payment Banks (PB) vs Small Finance Banks (SFB). PB: No lending, Max deposit ₹2 Lakh, 75% SLR requirement. SFB: Can lend, 75% Priority Sector Lending target. Promoters: Telcos, NBFCs, Supermarket chains, Corporate BCs.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying regulatory bodies or new institutions, create a 'Power & Restriction' table. UPSC rarely asks generic functions; they ask about the *boundaries* of power (e.g., 'Cannot issue credit cards').
Directly addresses which types of entities (e.g., mobile telephone companies, non-bank PPI issuers) can promote Payments Banks under RBI guidelines.
High-yield for banking/regulatory questions: understanding eligible promoter categories helps answer licensing and ownership questions on Payments Banks and distinguishes them from other bank types. Connects to questions on financial inclusion and private sector participation. Learn by memorizing promoter categories and mapping to real examples (Airtel, Paytm).
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
RBI guidelines couple promoter eligibility with operational rules (deposit caps, inability to lend, ability to issue debit/ATM cards) that shape why certain promoters are targeted.
Important for UPSC questions that ask about scope and purpose of Payments Banks — knowing limits (deposit ceiling, no lending) explains policy intent (financial inclusion). Useful across ethics, GS III (banking) and case-based MCQs. Study by linking promoter rules to operational constraints and examples.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 21. Payment Banks: > p. 87
Payments Banks operate under RBI guidelines and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, so promoter eligibility is set within RBI's regulatory framework.
Crucial for questions on institutional roles and legal frameworks; shows how RBI authorises and regulates payment systems, linking to broader topics like NPCI and the PSS Act. Prep strategy: map key statutes and RBI powers to specific entities (Payments Banks, NPCI) with examples.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 10.Oversight of payment and settlement systems > p. 70
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
RBI guidelines specify which types of non-bank entities can be promoters (e.g., non-bank PPI issuers and other entities such as mobile telephone companies).
Questions on licensing and promoter eligibility for new bank types (like Payments Banks) are frequently tested. Mastering which classes of entities qualify helps eliminate incorrect options and links to regulatory categories (PPI issuers, telecoms). Learn by mapping RBI guideline summaries and memorising canonical examples.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
Payments Banks have distinctive operational restrictions—maximum per-customer deposits, prohibition on lending, but ability to issue ATM/debit cards and provide remittance services—that define their business model and suitability of promoters.
High-yield for UPSC banking questions: knowing operational constraints helps reason why certain promoters (e.g., firms focused on payments) are preferred. Connects to questions on financial inclusion, bank types, and regulatory objectives. Memorise key limits (deposit cap, no credit issuance) and examples.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 21. Payment Banks: > p. 87
Payments Banks were created to promote financial inclusion and target low-income, migrant, and underserved customers—context that explains promoter selection and product restrictions.
Understanding policy intent (financial inclusion) is essential for analytical UPSC answers and for linking questions on committee recommendations (e.g., Nachiket Mor) to regulatory measures. Study the objective, target groups, and how product limits serve inclusion goals.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 21. Payment Banks: > p. 87
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking - Part II > 3.1 History of Indian Banking and Reforms > p. 128
References explicitly state Payment Banks cannot lend or issue credit cards and have deposit caps—central to answering whether they may issue credit cards.
High-yield for UPSC banking/regulatory questions: distinguishes Payment Banks' mandate and limits under RBI licensing. Frequently tested in comparisons of banking categories and in questions on financial inclusion policy. Prepare by memorising permitted vs. prohibited activities and the rationale (financial inclusion, limited-risk model).
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 21. Payment Banks: > p. 87
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 7: Money and Banking > Payments Banks > p. 190
Digital Banking Units (DBUs). Just as Payment Banks were the trend in 2016, DBUs are the current equivalent. Prediction: 'DBUs are distinct legal entities separate from their parent banks' (False, they are just specialized fixed-point business units of existing Scheduled Commercial Banks).
Etymology Hack: The name is 'Payment' Bank, not 'Credit' Bank. Its core function is payments/remittances. A 'Credit Card' is essentially an unsecured loan (credit). Therefore, if it cannot lend (Statement 3), it logically cannot issue Credit Cards (Statement 2). This link eliminates options A and D instantly.
Mains GS-III (Inclusive Growth): Payment Banks represent the shift from 'Brick and Mortar' banking to 'High Tech-Low Cost' banking. Use this as a case study for how technology (JAM Trinity) solves the 'Last Mile' problem where traditional branches failed.