Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. In the revenue administration of Delhi Sultanate, the in-charge of revenue collection was known as 'Amil'. 2. The Iqta system of Sultans of Delhi was an ancient indigenous institution. 3. The office of 'Mir Bakshi' came into existence during the reign of Khalji Sultans of Delhi. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (Statement 1 only).
**Statement 1 is correct**: Amil was primarily responsible for the collection of the revenue[1] in the Delhi Sultanate's revenue administration. Amils carried the earnings from such territories to the central treasury.[2]
**Statement 2 is incorrect**: The pernicious iqta system, which the first Muslim rulers of Delhi had adopted[3], indicates that the Iqta system was not an ancient indigenous institution but rather adopted by the Muslim rulers. Iqta refers to a land grant or assignment, given to a military commander[4], and this system had its origins in the Islamic administrative traditions of Central Asia and Persia, not in ancient India.
**Statement 3 is incorrect**: The office of 'Mir Bakshi' was actually a Mughal administrative position that came into existence during the Mughal period, not during the Khalji Sultanate. The Mir Bakshi was the head of the military department under the Mughals and did not exist in the Delhi Sultanate period.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct.
Sources- [1] https://cbc.gov.in/cbcdev/delhi-sultanat/delhi-story.html
- [2] https://cbc.gov.in/cbcdev/delhi-sultanat/delhi-story.html
- [3] http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/files/2025-05/Ebook/a_history_of_india_second_edition.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Chronological Swap' trap. UPSC tests if you can distinguish between Sultanate (Turko-Afghan) and Mughal (Timurid) administrative terms. While specific definitions like 'Amil' might seem obscure or web-based, the question is easily cracked by eliminating the obvious mismatches in Statements 2 and 3 using standard static knowledge.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the revenue administration of the Delhi Sultanate, was the official in charge of revenue collection called "Amil"?
- Statement 2: Was the Iqta system used by the Sultans of Delhi an ancient indigenous (native Indian) institution?
- Statement 3: Did the office of "Mir Bakshi" originate during the reign of the Khalji Sultans of the Delhi Sultanate?
- Explicitly names 'Amil' among local officials responsible for administration.
- Directly states that Amil was primarily responsible for the collection of revenue.
- Describes the role of Amils in handling revenues from crown (Khalisa) lands.
- Shows Amils carried earnings to the central treasury, confirming their revenue-collection function.
Identifies the term 'amil-guzar or revenue collector' as a named revenue official (in a land-revenue context) — shows 'amil' is a known administrative title in Indian revenue history.
A student could check chronological usage: compare whether this term appears in Mughal-era sources only or also in earlier Sultanate records to test applicability to the Delhi Sultanate.
Gives the related form 'Amin' as an official ensuring imperial regulations in the provinces, indicating variants of the title existed in imperial administration.
A student could examine spelling/linguistic variants (amil, amin) across Persian/Arabic records and trace when each form is used historically to judge Sultanate usage.
Describes the iqta system where territories were assigned to nobles (iqtadars) to collect taxes, showing that during the Sultanate tax collection was often carried out by iqtadars rather than a centrally named 'amil'.
A student could contrast the roles/terms used for revenue collectors in iqta-based systems (iqtadar) versus later centralized administrations to see if 'amil' fits Sultanate practice.
States that under a Sultanate land-tenure system an official was 'bestowed' the collection of estate revenue and governing power — confirming that an identifiable revenue official role existed in the Sultanate.
A student could use this to motivate searching primary/secondary Sultanate-era records for the specific title used for such officials (e.g., amil, iqtadar, malik).
Notes Firuz Tughlaq reformed and 'toned up' revenue administration and reintroduced hereditary appointments, implying administrative titles/roles could change over Sultanate reigns.
A student could investigate whether title usage (such as 'amil') varied between dynasties or was introduced/standardized under later rulers.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.