Question map
The Gandhi-Irwin Pact included which of the following ? 1. Invitation to Congress to participate in the Round Table Conference 2. Withdrawal of Ordinances promulgated in connection with the Civil Disobedience Movement 3. Acceptance of Gandhiji's suggestion for enquiry into police excesses 4. Release of only those prisoners who were not charged with violence Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (1, 2 and 4 only). The Gandhi-Irwin Pact, signed in March 1931, served as a political compromise between the Indian National Congress and the British Government.
- Statement 1 is correct: The Congress agreed to discontinue the Civil Disobedience Movement and participate in the Second Round Table Conference.
- Statement 2 is correct: The British Government agreed to withdraw all ordinances issued to curb the Civil Disobedience Movement.
- Statement 4 is correct: A critical clause was the release of political prisoners, but this was strictly limited to those not charged with violence. This led to significant public discontent as it excluded revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: Lord Irwin categorically rejected Gandhiji's demand for a public inquiry into police excesses, making this a major point of concession by the Congress.
Thus, while the pact secured the release of peaceful protesters and the right to make salt for personal use, it did not grant an inquiry into police conduct.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Terms & Conditions' question found verbatim in standard texts like Spectrum (Chapter 19). The difficulty lies only in recalling the 'Rejected Demands' list. If you memorized what Gandhi *failed* to get (Bhagat Singh's commutation, Police enquiry), the answer is immediate.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did the Gandhi-Irwin Pact include an invitation to the Indian National Congress to participate in the Round Table Conference?
- Statement 2: Did the Gandhi-Irwin Pact provide for the withdrawal of ordinances promulgated in connection with the Civil Disobedience Movement?
- Statement 3: Did the Gandhi-Irwin Pact include acceptance of Mahatma Gandhi's suggestion to hold an inquiry into police excesses?
- Statement 4: Did the Gandhi-Irwin Pact provide for the release of only those prisoners who were not charged with violence?
- Explicitly states that by the Gandhi–Irwin Pact Gandhiji consented to participate in a Round Table Conference.
- Directly links the pact to Congress engagement with the Round Table process.
- Summarises the pact as causing the Congress to agree to attend the Second Round Table Conference.
- Frames the pact as the mechanism by which Congress participation in the RTC was secured.
- Describes the pact as a compromise between Gandhi and Irwin and notes Congress nominated Gandhi as its sole representative to the Second RTC.
- Shows the practical outcome of the pact: Congress representation at the Round Table Conference.
- Explicitly lists 'withdrawal of emergency ordinances' among the items Irwin agreed to under the Gandhi-Irwin Pact.
- Appears in the compact enumeration of concessions given by the Viceroy, directly addressing ordinances tied to the movement.
- Describes the Gandhi–Irwin Pact as the settlement that called off civil disobedience and granted several concessions, providing contextual support that the pact included concrete government measures.
- Confirms the pact's role in ending the movement and securing specific rights and releases, consistent with the pact containing ordinance-related concessions.
- Directly states Gandhi agreed to stop pressing for an inquiry into police excesses as part of the agreement.
- Implies the pact did not include acceptance of Gandhi's demand for such an inquiry, since Gandhi 'will no longer press' it.
- Lists the concrete terms accepted in the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (releases, remission of fines, return of lands) without mentioning any inquiry.
- Shows the pact's focus on prisoner release and ending the movement rather than on instituting an inquiry into police conduct.
Gives the pact's agreed items in a numbered list and then explicitly states the viceroy turned down two of Gandhi's demands, one being a public inquiry into police excesses.
A student could compare this list of agreed items with independent reproductions of the pact text or contemporary newspaper/official records to see whether an inquiry appears among the pact terms.
Summarises the pact terms (civil disobedience called off, prisoners released, salt manufacture allowed) showing what the pact did include, which helps detect omissions such as an inquiry.
Use the summary of included terms as a checklist and verify absence of an inquiry by consulting the full agreement text or official communiqués.
Also lists concrete concessions granted by the government (salt, release of prisoners, picketing permitted), reinforcing a pattern of what kinds of demands were accepted.
A student could note the pattern of concessions (practical/administrative) and infer that acceptance of a public inquiry (a judicial/administrative probe) would likely be explicitly recorded if agreed, so its absence in such lists is suggestive.
Describes the scale of repression that motivated Gandhi's demand for an inquiry into police excesses, explaining why such a demand would have been raised during negotiations.
Combine this context (widespread police repression) with the pact summaries to judge plausibility: if repression was a central issue but inquiry is not listed among concessions, that is a significant omission to check against original texts.
Notes that Home Department/official reports sometimes questioned police accounts, implying official awareness of contested police behaviour and that inquiries or investigations were a conceivable demand.
A student could use this rule (official reports sometimes doubting police versions) to argue that a demand for a public inquiry was plausible and then look for mention/acceptance of such an inquiry in government records or the pact text.
- Explicit pact term: 'immediate release of all political prisoners not convicted of violence'.
- Lists the release condition using the phrase 'not convicted of violence', directly matching the statement.
- Direct summary of the March 1931 settlement saying the Government agreed to release political prisoners who had remained non-violent.
- Connects the release clause specifically to the Gandhi–Irwin agreement.
- States the government agreed to release political prisoners 'who had not indulged in violence'.
- Also records Gandhi's release and negotiation context, supporting the scope and intent of the pact.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly solvable from Spectrum (Modern India) > Chapter 19 > Gandhi-Irwin Pact section.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Truce' phase of the National Movement (1931) and the transition from Mass Movement (CDM) to Constitutional Negotiation (RTC).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the specific 'Accepted' vs 'Rejected' list: Accepted -> Salt for personal use, Peaceful picketing, Return of unsold lands. Rejected -> Commutation of Bhagat Singh/Rajguru/Sukhdev death sentences, Public enquiry into police excesses.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying historical Pacts (Lucknow, Delhi/Gandhi-Irwin, Poona), do not just read the summary. Create a T-Chart of 'Demands vs Concessions'. UPSC traps are almost always hidden in the 'Rejected' column or the 'Fine Print' (e.g., 'prisoners NOT charged with violence').
The pact ended civil disobedience, secured release of prisoners, and produced consent by Gandhi/Congress to engage with the Round Table Conference.
High-yield for questions on negotiation outcomes in the freedom movement; links civil disobedience campaigns to formal constitutional talks and helps explain shifts from protest to negotiation. Useful for essays and source-based questions on causes and consequences of agreements.
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > The Independence Day Pledge, 26 January 1930 > p. 40
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Gandhi-Irwin Pact > p. 379
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 3.2 Dialogues > p. 300
The Congress agreed to attend the Second RTC and nominated Gandhi as its sole representative following the pact.
Important for understanding representation and bargaining power in imperial constitutional negotiations; helps answer questions on leadership roles, delegation choices, and the limits of negotiation. Enables comparisons between different RTCs and why Congress skipped others.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Second Round Table Conference > p. 384
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Ideological Differences and Similarities between Gandhi and Ambedkar > p. 400
The Karachi Congress session formally endorsed the Delhi (Gandhi–Irwin) Pact and reflects internal political response to attending the RTC.
Helps explain intra-party dynamics and legitimacy of political decisions; vital for questions on mass responses, party endorsements, and the impact of major events (e.g., executions) on political consensus. Useful for connecting national decision-making with grassroots reactions.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Karachi Congress Session—1931 > p. 381
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Ideological Differences and Similarities between Gandhi and Ambedkar > p. 400
The pact specified a list of concrete concessions by the government including withdrawal of emergency ordinances and release of non-violent political prisoners.
High-yield for paper II/modern history: questions often ask for specific terms of negotiations between Congress and the Raj. Mastering the pact's enumerated items helps answer causation and consequence questions and links to topics on colonial concession-making and negotiation strategy.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Gandhi-Irwin Pact > p. 379
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 3.2 Dialogues > p. 300
One immediate outcome of the Gandhi–Irwin Pact was the calling off/suspension of the Civil Disobedience Movement in exchange for government concessions.
Important for understanding Gandhian strategy and Congress tactics; explains short-term compromises versus long-term goals. Useful for timeline, cause-effect, and evaluation questions on non-cooperation and satyagraha.
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 15: Struggle for Swaraj > The Second Civil Disobedience Movement > p. 289
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 3.2 Dialogues > p. 300
While the pact granted several concessions, it also left out key demands such as commutation of Bhagat Singh's sentence and public inquiry into police excesses.
Useful to contrast negotiated gains with unresolved issues; helps answer questions on the political limitations of negotiations and how partial concessions affected subsequent movements and public opinion.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Gandhi-Irwin Pact > p. 379
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Advent of Gandhi and Mass Mobilisation > 4.7 The Round Table Conferences > p. 53
The pact specified concrete concessions (release of non-violent political prisoners, salt manufacture for personal use, permitted picketing) rather than agreeing to all of Gandhi's demands.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask for the specific provisions and limits of negotiated settlements during the freedom struggle. Mastering the pact's listed terms helps contrast negotiated concessions with demands that were refused, and links to topics on Civil Disobedience and Round Table Conferences.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 19: Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences > Gandhi-Irwin Pact > p. 379
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 3.2 Dialogues > p. 300
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Advent of Gandhi and Mass Mobilisation > 4.7 The Round Table Conferences > p. 53
The Karachi Session (1931) presided by Vallabhbhai Patel. It endorsed this Pact but is more famous for the Resolution on Fundamental Rights and National Economic Programme (drafted by Nehru). Expect a question on the specific content of that Economic Programme.
Apply the 'State Prestige' logic to Statement 3. A colonial authoritarian regime (British Raj) would never agree to a formal 'enquiry into police excesses' as it would demoralize their own enforcement machinery and admit guilt. If 3 is impossible, Options C and D are eliminated instantly.
Link 'Withdrawal of Ordinances' to Indian Polity (Article 123). Contrast the Colonial Viceroy's ordinance power (used to suppress rights) with the Constitutional President's ordinance power (subject to judicial review and legislative approval).