Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement I : At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28), India refrained from signing the 'Declaration on Climate and Health'. Statement II : The COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health is a binding declaration; and if signed, it becomes mandatory to decarbonize health sector. Statement III : If India's health sector is decarbonized, the resilience of its health-care system may be compromised. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation
India has refused to sign the COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health[1], making Statement I correct. However, Statement II is incorrect because the declaration is a detailed, nonbinding, aspirational call to action[3], not a binding declaration. Statement III is also incorrect as it contradicts the declaration's purpose—the declaration focuses on gathering support, galvanising action and mobilising finances to improve the resilience of health systems[5]. In fact, decarbonizing the health sector is intended to strengthen, not compromise, health system resilience. India cited curbing greenhouse gases use for cooling in the health sector as the reason, stating that it would not be possible to fulfil the same within a short term[6]—a practical implementation concern rather than fears about resilience being compromised. Since both Statement II and Statement III are incorrect, option D is correct.
Sources- [1] https://www.livemint.com/news/india/india-refuses-to-sign-cop28-declaration-on-climate-and-health-heres-why-11701618953067.html
- [2] https://www.csis.org/analysis/bridging-health-and-climate-cop28
- [3] https://www.csis.org/analysis/bridging-health-and-climate-cop28
- [4] https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/cop28-health-is-finally-on-the-agenda-but-theres-more-to-do-as-we-face-continued-climate-extremes/article67620966.ece
- [5] https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/cop28-health-is-finally-on-the-agenda-but-theres-more-to-do-as-we-face-continued-climate-extremes/article67620966.ece
- [6] https://www.livemint.com/news/india/india-refuses-to-sign-cop28-declaration-on-climate-and-health-heres-why-11701618953067.html
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question tests the 'India as a Dissenter' archetype in climate diplomacy. It is not enough to know India attended COP28; you must track what we *rejected*. The key is distinguishing between broad consensus (Paris Agreement) and sectoral 'side-deals' (Health, Methane) which India often avoids due to developmental constraints.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did India refrain from signing the COP28 "Declaration on Climate and Health"?
- Statement 2: Is the COP28 "Declaration on Climate and Health" a legally binding declaration?
- Statement 3: Does signing the COP28 "Declaration on Climate and Health" legally obligate signatories to decarbonize their health sectors?
- Statement 4: Would decarbonizing India's health sector compromise the resilience of India's health-care system?
- Statement 5: Was India's decision not to sign the COP28 "Declaration on Climate and Health" explained by concerns that the declaration was legally binding and would make decarbonization of the health sector mandatory?
- Statement 6: Was India's decision not to sign the COP28 "Declaration on Climate and Health" explained by concerns that decarbonizing India's health sector would compromise the resilience of its health-care system?
- Directly states that India refused to sign the COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health.
- Notes India's stated reason (cites lack of practicality), supporting that India refrained from signing.
- Provides context that the COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health was widely supported (143 countries).
- This contrast highlights the significance of any notable non-signatories such as India (as reported in passage 2).
Defines that countries that sign UNFCCC-related treaties are called 'Parties' and frames COP processes as treaty/party-based events.
A student could use this to check whether the COP28 Health declaration was presented to Parties and then look up which Parties (e.g., India) formally endorsed it.
Provides an example (Kunming Declaration) of a COP-era declaration adopted by many countries, illustrating that such non-binding declarations are commonly issued at COPs and have signatory lists.
Use the pattern that COP declarations publish participants/signatories and then consult the COP28 declaration signatory list to see if India is listed.
Records that India signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol (a major climate treaty), showing India does sign international climate agreements.
Combine this with current-events checking: since India has precedent for signing climate instruments, verify whether it followed that precedent at COP28 by consulting the COP28 declaration signatories.
Notes India made new climate commitments at COP26, indicating active participation in recent COP processes and willingness to make public commitments at COP meetings.
A student could infer India’s engagement level at COPs and then check participant statements or the official COP28 declaration record to confirm whether India signed the health declaration.
Shows India issues voluntary climate targets (INDC) rather than always accepting binding obligations, indicating India distinguishes between types of commitments.
Use this rule to hypothesize that India might selectively sign non-binding declarations based on content; then check the COP28 declaration text/signatory list to see if India withheld endorsement.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.