GS2 2018 Q11 15 marks 250 words Federalism and Delhi

UPSC Mains 2018 GS2 Q11 — Federalism and Delhi

Whether the Supreme Court Judgement (July 2018) can settle the political tussle between the Lt. Governor and elected government of Delhi? Examine. (Answer in 250 words)

Question Decoded — examiner's intent

Directive verbs
Examine
Scope keywords
Supreme Court Judgement (July 2018)settle the political tussleLt. Governorelected government of Delhi
Implicit sub-parts
  • What were the core legal principles and 'concurring' interpretations laid down in the 2018 Five-Judge Bench ruling?
  • How did the judgement clarify the 'Aid and Advice' clause of Article 239AA vis-à-vis the LG's discretionary powers?
  • What practical ambiguities remained unresolved post-2018 (e.g., control over services) that led to further litigation?
  • Can a judicial interpretation truly solve a 'political' friction rooted in dual-governance structures?
Common pitfalls
  • Focusing too much on the 1991 Act details without discussing the specific 2018 judicial shift regarding the LG as an 'administrator' only.
  • Ignoring the subsequent 2023 Supreme Court ruling and the 2023 Ordinance/Act which proved the 2018 judgement did not actually 'settle' the tussle.
  • Treating it as a general essay on Delhi's statehood rather than a specific legal examination of the 2018 'Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India' case.
  • Failing to mention the 'Principles of Federalism' and 'Representative Democracy' which were the philosophical bedrock of the judgement.
Dimensions required
Constitutional Law (Article 239AA)Asymmetric FederalismExecutive-Legislative RelationsAdministrative EfficiencyJurisprudential Evolution
Marks allocation hint

Dedicate 50-60 words to the 2018 ruling's key takeaways (LG as facilitator, not obstructionist). Use 100-120 words to analyze the 'Examine' part—why it provided clarity but failed to stop the tussle (ambiguity on 'Services'). Spend the final 70 words discussing the subsequent legislative overrides and the inherent friction in the 'Union Territory with Legislature' model.

Unlock the full analysis for this question

You've seen the question and its examiner-intent decoding. Subscribers also get:

  • 🔗 Similar Previous Year Questions — cross-year, cross-paper matches so you study the topic, not the question
  • 📚 Source Map — verified citations from Laxmikanth, NCERT, PRS, Yojana, Economic Survey, Spectrum
  • 🌱 How this topic is evolving — current-affairs bridge anchored to live TARS news clustering
  • 🧭 Examiner's Pattern — how the topic has been framed across every year UPSC has tested it
  • ✍️ Answer Skeleton — a structured outline (intro → body → conclusion) you can flesh out
  • 🎯 AI evaluation — write your answer, get rubric-based scoring from gs-eval

Or browse 132+ free preview questions across all years and papers — the first 3 questions of every paper are unlocked.

Ready to practice?

Subscribers can attempt this question in 250 words and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where they stand.

Subscribe to evaluate your answer →