Which of the follwong is true regarding No Confidence Motion in the Parliament ?

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: (SSC/0)

Which of the follwong is true regarding ‘No Confidence Motion’ in the Parliament ?

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

SSC

stats: 

0,14,21,13,4,4,14

keywords: 

{'confidence motion': [2, 0, 1, 1], 'parliament': [15, 1, 3, 8], 'lok sabha': [42, 3, 20, 27], 'constitution': [39, 3, 11, 39], 'motion': [0, 0, 0, 3]}

Regarding the `No Confidence Motion` in the Parliament, the correct answer is option 4 - It can be introduced in the Lok Sabha only.

Option 1 states that there is no mention of it in the Constitution, which is incorrect. The No Confidence Motion is mentioned in Article 75(3) and Article 164(4) of the Constitution.

Option 2 states that a period of six months must lapse between the introduction of one No Confidence Motion and another, which is also incorrect. There is no such mandatory time period specified in the rules.

Option 3 states that at least 100 persons must support the motion before it is introduced in the House, which is again incorrect. A No Confidence Motion can be introduced by any member of the House, and there is no minimum number of supporters required.

Therefore, option 4 is the correct answer.