Option 1: Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.

This option suggests that both statements are true, and that Statement II provides an accurate explanation for Statement I. In this case, Statement I states that a Brahmana named Basavanna led a new movement in Karnataka in the twelfth century. Statement II says that the Lingayats worshiped Shiva in his manifestation as a Linga. According to this option, the emergence of the new movement in Karnataka led by Basavanna is linked to the Lingayats` worship of Shiva.

Option 2: Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.

This option suggests that both statements are true, but Statement II does not provide the correct explanation for Statement I. In this case, although Basavanna led a new movement in Karnataka in the twelfth century (Statement I), the fact that the Lingayats worshiped Shiva in his Linga form (Statement II) may not necessarily be directly related to the emergence of the movement.

Option 3: Statement I is true but Statement II is false.

This option suggests that Statement I is true, meaning that Basavanna led a new movement in Karnataka in the