Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. The Sustainable Development Goals were first proposed in 1972 by a global think tank called the 'Club of Rome'. 2. The Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved by 2030. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (Statement 2 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015[2], not in 1972. While the Club of Rome is a global think tank that came out with a report called "The Limits to Growth" in 1972[4], this report dealt with sustainable development concepts in general, not the specific SDGs. The theoretical framework for sustainable development evolved between 1972 and 1992, beginning with the UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972[5]. The SDGs themselves were formally proposed and adopted much later.
**Statement 2 is correct:** The Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved by 2030[6]. SDGs replaced the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and were adopted in 2015 to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030[1].
Sources- [1] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
- [2] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 8: Inclusive growth and issues > 8.15 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > p. 278
- [3] https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-sustainable-development-agenda
- [4] https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/RCC/docs/rccap20/IP1_UNRCC-AP%20Paper%20G%20Scott.pdf
- [5] https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/RCC/docs/rccap20/IP1_UNRCC-AP%20Paper%20G%20Scott.pdf
- [6] Economics, Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: Poverty as a Challenge > Poverty and Sustainable Development Goals > p. 37
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Timeline Swap' trap. UPSC tested if you could distinguish the *philosophical origin* of sustainability (1972, Club of Rome) from the *specific policy framework* (2015, SDGs). Strategy: For every major global agreement, memorize the 'Family Tree'βGrandfather (1972), Father (1992/2000), and Child (2015).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Were the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) first proposed in 1972?
- Statement 2: Were the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) first proposed by the global think tank the Club of Rome?
- Statement 3: Do the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have a target date of 2030 for their achievement?
- Explicitly presents the claim that SDGs were first proposed in 1972 and marks that claim as incorrect.
- Provides the answer key indicating only the 2030 target statement is correct, thereby refuting the 1972 origin claim.
- States Member States agreed by consensus to adopt 'Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development' in 2015.
- Shows the SDGs/2030 Agenda were established in 2015, not first proposed in 1972.
- Notes the evolution of the sustainable development framework occurred between 1972 and 1992, starting with the 1972 Stockholm conference.
- Indicates 1972 began environmental sustainability discussions but does not state SDGs were proposed then β implying the SDGs came later.
States that the SDGs 'were adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015', giving a clear adoption date for the SDG framework.
A student can compare the 2015 adoption date with 1972 and infer that 1972 is unlikely to be the proposal year unless earlier documents show continuity.
Also records that the SDGs were 'adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015', reinforcing the 2015 origin.
Combining multiple sources that cite 2015 makes it reasonable to suspect the SDGs were not first proposed in 1972 and to check UN records around 2015.
Summarizes that the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were set in 2000 and that the SDGs 'replaced MDGs' and were 'adopted ... in 2015', providing a timeline of related UN goal-sets.
A student can use this timeline (MDGs 2000 β SDGs 2015) to question any claim that SDGs trace back as far as 1972 and seek primary UN declarations from those years.
Gives the specific origin year (2000) for the MDGs, showing major UN global goal-sets occurred in 2000 and 2015 rather than earlier decades.
Use this to reason that major UN goal-setting moments are clustered around 2000 and 2015, making a 1972 proposal for the SDGs atypical and worth verifying against UN conference outputs.
Notes the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm) as the start of decades of environmental governance efforts and links later bodies (UNEA) and discussions to Rio+20 (2012) and the SDGs.
A student could infer that 1972 began environmental governance discussions but that explicit SDG work emerged much later (e.g., Rio+20 and 2012β2015), so they should check whether any 1972 text explicitly proposed 'SDGs' or only broader environmental governance.
- Explicitly lists the claim as statement 1 and provides the correct answer indicating statement 1 is false.
- Therefore this source directly refutes that the SDGs were first proposed by the Club of Rome.
- States that the idea of 'sustainable development' dates back to 1972 with the Club of Rome's report The Limits to Growth.
- Distinguishes the earlier concept/report from the later UN SDGs (which are a separate 2015 framework), implying the Club of Rome did not 'first propose' the SDGs themselves.
- Identifies the Club of Rome as 'a global think tank' active since 1968 and links it to The Limits to Growth (1972).
- Provides background that the Club of Rome predated the SDGs but does not claim it proposed the UN's SDG framework.
Describes the Club of Rome as a 1968-founded think tank and credits its 1972 'Limits to Growth' report with starting the global sustainability movement.
A student could note the Club of Rome's early role in sustainability (1972) and compare that date with when SDGs were formulated/adopted to assess temporal plausibility of direct authorship.
States that the SDGs were adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015 as a UN initiative.
A student could infer that because SDGs are a UN Member States adoption, origin likely lies in UN processes rather than solely a private think tank, and check UN fora and timelines.
Notes that SDGs replaced the MDGs and were adopted in 2015, linking SDGs to an evolution of UN-led goals.
One could trace the institutional lineage (MDGs β SDGs) within UN history to test if an external think tank originated the SDG proposal or if it emerged from UN negotiations.
Summarizes that MDGs were set by UN member states in 2000 and that SDGs succeeded them, reinforcing the pattern of UN-created goal-sets.
Use this pattern (UN member states set global goals) to hypothesize that the SDGs were likely developed through UN mechanisms and verify by checking UN preparatory bodies and documents.
Lists the Club of Rome alongside other major sustainability milestones (Brundtland Commission, Earth Summit), suggesting multiple contributors to the sustainability agenda over time.
A student could interpret this as indicating influence (ideas feeding into the broader agenda) rather than direct authorship, and then investigate which bodies formally proposed the SDGs.
- Explicitly states SDGs were adopted in 2015 to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity by 2030.
- Directly asserts 'The Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved by 2030.'
- NCERT snippet clearly says the 17 SDGs are 'to be achieved by 2030'.
- Gives an example target tied to the 2030 timeframe (SDG 1 target for poverty reduction by 2030).
- States SDGs were adopted by all UN Member States in 2015 as a call to action to ensure peace and prosperity 'by 2030'.
- Reinforces the 2030 deadline while describing the SDGs' scope and intent.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. In 2016, SDGs were the single biggest Current Affairs topic (adopted late 2015). The Club of Rome (1972) is a static fact in every Environment book (e.g., Shankar IAS).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Evolution of Global Environmental Governance (Timeline of Summits).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1972: Club of Rome ('Limits to Growth') & Stockholm Conference. 1987: Brundtland Commission ('Our Common Future' - defined Sustainable Development). 1992: Rio Earth Summit (Agenda 21). 2000: MDGs (8 Goals). 2012: Rio+20 ('The Future We Want' - where SDGs were actually proposed). 2015: UN Summit adopts SDGs.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not just memorize the 17 goals. You must master the 'Institutional History'. UPSC creates false statements by attributing a UN process (SDGs) to a private think tank (Club of Rome) or swapping dates by 40 years.
Several references state that the SDGs were adopted by all UN Member States in 2015 and replaced the Millennium Development Goals.
High-yield factual anchor: UPSC often asks dates and evolution of major UN initiatives. Knowing that SDGs were adopted in 2015 (not 1972) helps answer chronology questions and distinguish policy phases (MDGs β SDGs). Study by memorising timelines and comparing objectives of successive UN frameworks.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Sustainable Development Goals > p. 598
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 8: Inclusive growth and issues > 8.15 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > p. 278
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
References identify MDGs as the eight goals set in 2000 with a deadline of 2015, which SDGs subsequently replaced.
MDGs vs SDGs is a common comparison area in governance and international relations questions. Mastering MDG goals, timeframe (2000β2015) and limitations helps frame why SDGs were introduced and how targets expanded. Use tabular comparison and timeline drills for retention.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Millennium Development Goals > p. 597
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
Evidence links the 1972 Stockholm conference as the start of international environmental efforts and notes Rio+20 (2012) led to creation of the UN Environment Assembly (UNEA), which later engaged with SDG-related environmental agendas.
Understanding institutional evolution clarifies where initiatives originate versus when specific goals were proposed. UPSC questions often probe origin, continuity and institutional mechanisms (conferences, assemblies). Prepare by mapping major UN conferences and resultant institutions/agreements.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 28: International Organisation and Conventions > History of the United Nations Environment Assembly > p. 387
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > fuo+zo > p. 427
Multiple references state that the 17 SDGs were adopted by United Nations Member States in 2015, indicating the UN as the adopting body rather than a private think tank.
High-yield: questions often ask about institutional origins of global frameworks (who adopted/declared them and when). Understanding that SDGs are a UN product connects to questions on global governance, international agreements, and development agendas. Prepare by memorising key dates, adopting bodies, and the relationship between MDGs and SDGs.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 8: Inclusive growth and issues > 8.15 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > p. 278
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Sustainable Development Goals > p. 598
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
References identify the Club of Rome as a think tank founded in 1968 and link it to the 1972 'Limits to Growth' report, showing its role in early sustainability discourse but not as proposer of SDGs.
Medium-high: useful for questions on the historical evolution of environmental ideas and think-tank influence. Distinguishes early sustainability thought leaders (Club of Rome) from later multilateral instruments (UN SDGs). Study by mapping key reports and their influence on policy timelines.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > THE CLUB OF ROME AND LIMITS TO GROWTH > p. 596
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE > p. 595
Evidence shows the MDGs were set by UN member states in 2000 and that SDGs replaced MDGs in 2015, highlighting a UN-led continuity rather than an origin in external think tanks.
High-yield: UPSC frequently asks about MDGs, SDGs, and their evolution; mastering this helps answer questions on targets, timelines, and institutional responsibility. Learn comparative timelines, core differences, and the role of UN summits in setting global goals.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Millennium Development Goals > p. 597
- Economics, Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: Poverty as a Challenge > Poverty and Sustainable Development Goals > p. 37
All key references state the SDGs were adopted in 2015 with an explicit achievement timeline ending in 2030.
High-yield factual detail often asked in prelims and used in mains context on global agendas and timelines; connects to questions on international commitments and progress assessment. Learn the adoption year (2015), number of goals (17) and the 2030 target as a fixed fact for quick recall.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > CHAPTER SUMMARY > p. 607
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 8: Inclusive growth and issues > 8.15 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > p. 278
The 'Rio+20' Conference (2012) is the actual sibling fact. While 1972 started the conversation, the specific mandate to create 'SDGs' came from the outcome document 'The Future We Want' at Rio+20, not the Club of Rome.
Apply 'Bureaucratic Logic'. The term 'Sustainable Development Goals' implies a structured, consensus-based UN framework. 1972 was the era of radical warnings (Limits to Growth). It is logically impossible for a specific 2015 policy framework to have been proposed in 1972 and sit dormant for 43 years without being mentioned in the 1992 Rio Summit or 2000 MDGs.
Mains GS-2 (International Relations) & GS-3 (Economy): Contrast MDGs vs SDGs. MDGs were for developing nations (donor-recipient model); SDGs are 'Universal' (apply to rich and poor alike) and cover 'Planetary Boundaries' (Environment), not just poverty.