Question map
With reference to educational institutions during colonial rule in India, consider the following pairs : Institution Founder 1. Sanskrit College at Benaras - William Jones 2. Calcutta Madarsa - Warren Hastings 3. Fort William College - Arthur Wellesley Which of the pairs given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (2 only) because only the pairing of Calcutta Madarsa with Warren Hastings is accurate.
In 1781, Warren Hastings set up the Calcutta Madrasah for the study and teaching of Muslim law and related subjects[1], making pair 2 correct.
Pair 1 is incorrect because in 1791, Jonathan Duncan started a Sanskrit College at Varanasi[1], not William Jones. William Jones founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784[2], which was a different institution.
Pair 3 is also incorrect because Fort William College was set up by Wellesley in 1800[3], but his name was Lord Wellesley (Richard Wellesley), not Arthur Wellesley. Arthur Wellesley was his younger brother, who later became the Duke of Wellington and is famous for defeating Napoleon at Waterloo.
Therefore, only pair 2 correctly matches the institution with its founder.
Sources- [1] Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
- [2] https://nios.ac.in/media/documents/secsocscicour/english/lesson-05.pdf
- [3] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'Precision Trap' question. The facts are standard (Spectrum/NCERT), but the options rely on name confusion (Arthur vs. Richard Wellesley) and role confusion (Jones the Scholar vs. Duncan the Resident). If you read superficially, you walked into the trap.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Sanskrit College at Benaras (Varanasi) founded by William Jones during British colonial rule in India?
- Statement 2: Was the Calcutta Madarsa (Calcutta Madrasa) established by Warren Hastings during British colonial rule in India?
- Statement 3: Was Fort William College founded by Arthur Wellesley during British colonial rule in India?
- Explicitly names the founder of the Sanskrit College at Banaras as Jonathan Duncan with a date (1794).
- Directly contradicts the claim that William Jones founded the Sanskrit College.
- Attributes an institutional foundation to William Jones (Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784), showing his role was founding the Asiatic Society, not the Sanskrit College.
- Helps distinguish William Jones's activities from those of the actual founder of the Sanskrit College.
Explicitly names the founder as Jonathan Duncan (resident at Benaras) and gives the founding year 1791 for the Sanskrit College.
A student could check biographical timelines (Duncan vs Jones) and the college's founding records to see which individual's activities coincide with 1791.
Also states Jonathan Duncan started a Sanskrit College at Varanasi in 1791, repeating the same founder and date as a pattern across sources.
Compare multiple independent histories for consistency about the founder and date to weigh against the claim about William Jones.
Attributes establishment of a Sanskrit college in Benares to Cornwallis (presented as 'his successor') in 1791, showing there are multiple attributions to British officials other than William Jones.
A student could map which British officials were active in Benares in 1791 and cross-check which of them had authority to found such an institution.
Describes William Jones as an Orientalist who explored and translated classical texts, without mentioning institutional founding, suggesting his role was scholarly rather than administrative/foundational.
Use Jones's known biography (scholar/Orientalist) to assess whether founding a Sanskrit college fits his documented activities.
Shows the Sanskrit College was an established institution by 1850 (Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar became its principal), implying the college predated mid-19th-century figures and any claim about its founder should match earlier records.
Confirm the college's institutional continuity and earlier founding claims by checking who held authority to found it before 1850.
- Explicitly states: 'The Calcutta Madrasah was established by Warren Hastings in 1781.'
- Specifies purpose: study of Muslim law and related subjects, linking the institution to Hastings' initiative.
- Directly repeats that 'in 1781, Warren Hastings set up the Calcutta Madrasah' for teaching Muslim law.
- Places the Madrasah as one of the two minor educational exceptions during early Company rule, corroborating the claim.
- Describes establishment of a Madrasa with the support of Warren Hastings, adding corroborative nuance about local collaboration.
- Notes institutional details (started with forty stipendiary students), supporting the existence and Hastings' involvement.
- Explicitly names the Fort William College and attributes its founding to Wellesley.
- Gives the founding year (1800), placing it in the period of British colonial rule.
- Directly states that Fort William College was founded by Lord Wellesley.
- Repeats the founding year 1800, confirming the timeframe under British rule.
States that 'Wellesley (governor-general, 1798-1805) set up the Fort William College for training of new recruits' in 1800, linking the college's foundation to the Governor-General named Wellesley.
A student could note this ties the college to the Governor‑General Wellesley (1798–1805) and compare that officeholder's identity with 'Arthur Wellesley' to test if they are the same person.
Specifies 'College of Fort William was founded at Calcutta in 1800' and that it served Company's civil servants, reinforcing the date, place, and patron 'Wellesley'.
Use the 1800 date and the role (founder called Wellesley) plus a timeline of Arthur Wellesley's known activities to check plausibility of his being founder.
Explicitly says 'Wellesley therefore established the College of Fort William at Calcutta for the education of young recruits to the Civil Service', linking the institution to Wellesley's administrative actions.
Combine this attribution to 'Wellesley' with the fact that the founder is described as Governor‑General elsewhere to infer whether Arthur Wellesley (if not Governor‑General) is likely the founder.
Lists Fort William College being 'set up by Wellesley in 1800' among other educational foundations, giving a pattern that colonial Governor(s) or officials initiated such colleges.
A student could use this pattern (officials founding colleges) plus identification of which Wellesley held the founding administrative post in 1800 to assess the claim about Arthur Wellesley.
Describes 'Lord Wellesley' as Governor‑General (1798–1805) and outlines his active policy in India, which contextualises who 'Wellesley' refers to when institutions are attributed to that name.
Use this to distinguish 'Lord Wellesley' (Governor‑General active 1798–1805) from other Wellesleys (e.g., Arthur) by checking which Wellesley held that office in 1800.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap (Statement 3) / Sitter (Statement 2). Source: Spectrum Ch 30 (Education) or Old NCERT Bipin Chandra.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Evolution of British Education Policy: From Orientalism (Hastings/Duncan) to Anglicism (Macaulay).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Orientalist Trio': 1) Calcutta Madarsa (1781, Warren Hastings), 2) Asiatic Society (1784, William Jones), 3) Sanskrit College (1791, Jonathan Duncan). Also, distinguish the Wellesleys: Richard (GG, Subsidiary Alliance, Fort William College) vs. Arthur (General, Battle of Assaye).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When you see a famous surname like 'Wellesley', pause. UPSC often swaps the Governor-General (Richard) with his military brother (Arthur). Always verify the *first name* in historical pairs.
References identify specific founders/initiators for institutions (e.g., Warren Hastings for Calcutta Madrasah; Jonathan Duncan or Cornwallis for the Sanskrit College).
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask which official or reformer established particular colonial institutions. Mastering this helps answer institution-origin, administrative action, and education-policy items; link to broader topics like colonial administration and reformers. Learn by creating a timeline of institutions and their founders.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 17: Effects of British Rule > Education > p. 269
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
Evidence distinguishes scholarly Orientalists (William Jones, Charles Wilkins, Max Müller) who translated texts from administrators/residents (e.g., Jonathan Duncan, Cornwallis) who founded institutions.
Useful to distinguish roles in questions about cultural/intellectual history vs administrative actions during colonial rule. Helps classify actors (scholars vs officials) in cause–effect questions and essays on cultural encounters and institutional history.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > e) Invoking India's glorious Past > p. 7
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
References state the Company largely neglected education initially but made a few exceptions, citing specific institutions founded in the late 18th century.
Core concept for questions on colonial education policy and its evolution; connects to topics like missionary education, spread of modern education, and later reforms. Useful for comparative questions and framing essay/short-answer responses on policy continuity and exceptions.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
References repeatedly note the East India Company's general neglect of education but identify a few early exceptions including the Calcutta Madrasah.
High-yield for UPSC: explains the pattern of early colonial educational policy and helps answer questions on why and how limited institutional education began under Company rule. Connects to broader topics of colonial administrative priorities and cultural policy; useful for essays and prelims/GS mains questions on education under the British.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
Evidence specifies the Madrasah's foundation purpose — study and teaching of Muslim law and related subjects under Hastings' initiative.
Important for understanding targeted colonial educational initiatives aimed at legal/administrative needs; helps in answering questions on institutional objectives, communal/legal education, and links between administration and scholarship.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
References attribute founding of specific institutions to named officials (Warren Hastings for the Madrasah; Jonathan Duncan/Cornwallis for Sanskrit/other colleges).
Useful for tracing how early colonial policies often rested on individual initiatives rather than systematic government programmes. Helps tackle source-based questions, match officials to reforms, and compare ad hoc vs. institutional colonial reforms.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 17: Effects of British Rule > Education > p. 269
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 119
Multiple references state that Fort William College was founded in 1800 to train Company civil servants in languages and Indian customs.
High-yield for administrative-history questions: explains British efforts to train civil servants and the colonial institutional response to governance needs. Links to topics on education policy under the East India Company and later administrative reforms; useful for questions asking 'why' colonial institutions were set up and their functions.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 26: Constitutional, Administrative and Judicial Developments > Wellesley's Role > p. 514
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 17: Effects of British Rule > 17.5 Reforms in Civil and Judicial Administration > p. 269
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Under Company Rule > p. 563
Haileybury College (1806): Established in England to replace Fort William College because the Court of Directors disapproved of training officials in Calcutta. This is the logical successor fact to Statement 3.
Apply 'Role Consistency' logic. Arthur Wellesley was a military commander (later Duke of Wellington). Colleges are administrative/policy decisions made by the Head of State (Governor-General). Therefore, Arthur is unlikely to be the founder. Eliminate 3.
Mains GS1 (History/Culture): These institutions represent the 'Orientalist' phase where British rulers tried to govern India through Indian laws/customs. Contrast this with the 1835 Macaulay Minute (Anglicist phase) which aimed to create 'Brown Englishmen'.